ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Article : Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee
  • Auteurs
    Whiten et al
  • Année de publication
    2009
  • Journal
    philosophical transaction
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    We describe our recent studies of imitation and cultural transmission in chimpanzees and children,
    which question late twentieth-century characterizations of children as imitators, but chimpanzees as
    emulators. As emulation entails learning only about the results of others’ actions, it has been
    thought to curtail any capacity to sustain cultures. Recent chimpanzee diffusion experiments
    have by contrast documented a significant capacity for copying local behavioural traditions.
    Additionally, in recent ‘ghost’ experiments with no model visible, chimpanzees failed to replicate
    the object movements on which emulation is supposed to focus. We conclude that chimpanzees
    rely more on imitation and have greater cultural capacities than previously acknowledged. However,
    we also find that they selectively apply a range of social learning processes that include emulation.
    Recent studies demonstrating surprisingly unselective ‘over-imitation’ in children suggest that
    children’s propensity to imitate has been underestimated too. We discuss the implications of
    these developments for the nature of social learning and culture in the two species. Finally, our
    new experiments directly address cumulative cultural learning. Initial results demonstrate a relative
    conservatism and conformity in chimpanzees’ learning, contrasting with cumulative cultural learn-
    ing in young children. This difference may contribute much to the contrast in these species’
    capacities for cultural evolution

  • Accès libre
    Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    La culture, une spécificité humaine?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    0
    0
    0
    0