ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Article : Experimental simulations about the effects of overexploitation and habitat fragmentation on populations facing environmental warming
  • 1 1
  • Auteurs
    C., Metzger, R., Rollo, A., & Myers, R. A
  • Année de publication
    2007
  • Journal
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    Populations of many species are dramatically declining worldwide, but the causal mechanism remains debated among different human-related threats. Coping with this uncertainty is critical to several issues about the conservation and future of biodiversity, but remains challenging due to difficulties associated with the experimental manipulation and/or isolation of the effects of such threats under field conditions. Using controlled microcosm populations, we quantified the individual and combined effects of environmental warming, overexploitation and habitat fragmentation on population persistence. Individually, each of these threats produced similar and significant population declines, which were accelerated to different degrees depending upon particular interactions. The interaction between habitat fragmentation and harvesting generated an additive decline in population size. However, both of these threats reduced population resistance causing synergistic declines in populations also facing environmental warming. Declines in population size were up to 50 times faster when all threats acted together. These results indicate that species may be facing risks of extinction higher than those anticipated from single threat analyses and suggest that all threats should be mitigated simultaneously, if current biodiversity declines are to be reversed.

  • Accès libre
    Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    Sauvetage génétique : une solution à long terme pour les populations en déclin ?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    0
    0
    1
    0