ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Article : Mammal disparity decreases during the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation
  • 1 1
  • Auteurs
    D. M. Grossnickle, P. D. Polly
  • Année de publication
    2013
  • Journal
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    Fossil discoveries over the past 30 years have radically transformed traditional views of Mesozoic mammal evolution. In addition, recent research provides a more detailed account of the Cretaceous diversification of flowering plants. Here, we examine patterns of morphological disparity and functional morphology associated with diet in early mammals. Two analyses were performed: (i) an examination of diversity based on functional dental type rather than higher-level taxonomy, and (ii) a morphometric analysis of jaws, which made use of modern analogues, to assess changes in mammalian morphological and dietary disparity. Results demonstrate a decline in diversity of molar types during the mid-Cretaceous as abundances of triconodonts, symmetrodonts, docodonts and eupantotherians diminished. Multituberculates experience a turnover in functional molar types during the mid-Cretaceous and a shift towards plant-dominated diets during the late Late Cretaceous. Although therians undergo a taxonomic expansion coinciding with the angiosperm radiation, they display small body sizes and a low level of morphological disparity, suggesting an evolutionary shift favouring small insectivores. It is concluded that during the mid-Cretaceous, the period of rapid angiosperm radiation, mammals experienced both a decrease in morphological disparity and a functional shift in dietary morphology that were probably related to changing ecosystems.

  • Identifiant unique
    10.1098/rspb.2013.2110
  • Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    Origine et diversification des mammifères placentaires : avant ou après la crise Crétacé-Paléogène  ?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    1
    0
    0
    0