ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Titre de l'article

Compensation et conservation des espèces des Directives Oiseaux et Habitats

Introduction à l'article

Cet article analyse des projets de développement et leurs mesures de compensation dans le cadre des Directives Oiseaux et Habitats en France entre 2009 et 2010.

Publiée il y a plus de 6 ans par A.Frappa et V. Perez.
Dernière modification il y a plus de 6 ans.
Article : Offsets and conservation of the species of the EU Habitats and Birds Directives
  • 2 1
  • Auteurs
    Regnery B, Couvet D, Kerbiriou C
  • Année de publication
    2013
  • Journal
    Conservation Biology
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    Biodiversity offsets are intended to achieve no net loss of biodiversity due to economic and human development. A variety of biodiversity components are addressed by offset policies. It is required that loss of protected species due to development be offset under the EU Habitats and Birds Directives in Europe. We call this type of offset a species‐equality offset because the offset pertains to the same species affected by the development project. Whether species equality can be achieved by offset design is unknown. We addressed this gap by reviewing derogation files (i.e., specific files that describe mitigation measures to ensure no net loss under the EU Habitats and Birds Directives) from 85 development projects in France (2009–2010). We collected information on type of effect (reversible vs. irreversible) and characteristics of affected and offset sites (i.e., types of species, total area). We analyzed how the type of effect and the affected‐site characteristics influenced the occurrence of offset measures. The proportion of species targeted by offset measures (i.e., offset species) increased with the irreversibility of the effect of development and the conservation status of the species affected by development (i.e., affected species). Not all effects on endangered species (International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List) were offset; on average, 82% of affected species would be offset. Twenty‐six percent of species of least concern were offset species. Thirty‐five percent of development projects considered all affected species in their offset measures. Species richness was much lower in offset sites than in developed sites even after offset proposals. For developed areas where species richness was relatively high before development, species richness at offset sites was 5–10 times lower. The species‐equality principle appears to have been applied only partially in offset policies, as in the EU directives. We suggest the application of this principle through offsets is highly important for the long‐term conservation of biodiversity in Europe.

  • Identifiant unique
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12123
  • Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    Quel bénéfice écologique des mesures compensatoires ?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
  • Quel bénéfice écologique des mesures compensatoires ? Une solution pour préserver la biodiversité ou Une excuse pour dégrader la biodiversité
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0