ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Article : Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16s rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology
  • 1
  • Auteurs
    E. STACKEBRANDT, B. M. GOEBEL
  • Année de publication
    1994
  • Journal
    Microbiology Society
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    Because a natural entity “species” cannot be recognized as a group of strains that is genetically well separated from its phylogenetic neighbors, a pragmatic approach was taken to define a species by a polyphasic approach (L. G. Wayne, D. J. Brenner, R. R. Colwell, P. A. D. Grimont, 0. Kandler, M. I. Krichevsky, L. H. Moore, W. E. C. Moore, R. G. E. Murray, E. Stackebrandt, M. P. Starr, and H. G. Triiper, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37463-464, 1987), in which a DNA reassociation value of about 70% plays a dominant role. With the establishment of rapid sequence analysis of 16s rRNA and the recognition of its potential to determine the phylogenetic position of any prokaryotic organism, the role of 16s rRNA similarities in the present species definition in bacteriology needs to be clarified. Comparative studies clearly reveal the limitations of the sequence analysis of this conserved gene and gene product in the determination of relationships at the strain level for which DNA-DNA reassociation experiments still constitute the superior method. Since today the primary structure of 16s rRNA is easier to determine than hybridization between DNA strands, the strength of the sequence analysis is to recognize the level at which DNA pairing studies need to be performed, which certainly applies to similarities of 97% and higher.

  • Identifiant unique
    10.1099/00207713-44-4-846
  • Accès libre
    Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    La notion d' "espèce biologique" peut-elle s'appliquer à tout le vivant des vertébrés jusqu'aux unicellulaires et procaryotes ?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    0
    0
    1
    0