ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Article : The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism
  • Auteurs
    Steven W. Gangesta, Jeffry A. Simpson
  • Année de publication
    2000
  • Journal
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    During human evolutionary history, there were “trade-offs” between expending time and energy on child-rearing and mating, so both men and women evolved conditional mating strategies guided by cues signaling the circumstances. Many short-term matings might be successful for some men; others might try to find and keep a single mate, investing their effort in rearing her offspring. Recent evidence suggests that men with features signaling genetic benefits to offspring should be preferred by women as short-term mates, but there are trade-offs between a mate’s genetic fitness and his willingness to help in child-rearing. It is these circumstances and the cues that signal them that underlie the variation in short- and long-term mating strategies between and within the sexes.
    Keywords: conditional strategies; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; mating; reproductive strategies; sexual selection

  • Identifiant unique
    10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
  • Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    Homo sapiens est-il polygame ou monogame ?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    0
    0
    0
    0