ControverSciences est archivé. Il reste consultable mais il n'est plus possible de contribuer.
Le code source pour faire tourner le serveur reste disponible sur GitHub.
Titre de la review

Processus de spéciation : une vision génique.

2 Voir les autres contributions sur ce point
Résumé de la review

...

Ce que cette review apporte au débat

Wu a apporté une nouvelle conception de la notion d'espèce basée sur la génétique et propose que la barrière entre les espèces serait semi-perméable. Et ainsi, propose une définition moins stricte du BSC.
Elle a suscité un vif débat mais elle ne prend pas en compte (dû à son année de publication) les nouvelles avancées en génomique.

Publiée il y a plus de 8 ans par M. Hammel et Marion.Cheron.
Dernière modification il y a plus de 8 ans.
Review : The genic view of the process of speciation
  • 1 1 1
  • Auteurs
    Chung-I Wu
  • Année de publication
    2001
  • Journal
    Journal of Evolutionary Biology
  • Abstract (dans sa langue originale)

    The unit of adaptation is usually thought to be a gene or set of interacting genes, rather than the whole genome, and this may be true of species differentiation. De®ning species on the basis of reproductive isolation (RI), on the other hand, is a concept best applied to the entire genome. The biological species concept (BSC; Mayr, 1963) stresses the isolation aspect of speciation on the basis of two fundamental genetic assumptions ± the number of loci underlying species differentiation is large and the whole genome behaves as a cohesive, or coadapted genetic unit. Under these tenets, the exchange of any part of the genomes between diverging groups is thought to destroy their integrity. Hence, the maintenance of each species' genome cohesiveness by isolating mechanisms has become the central concept of species. In contrast, the Darwinian view of speciation is about differential adaptation to different natural or sexual environments. RI is viewed as an important by product of differential adaptation and complete RI across the whole genome need not be considered as the most central criterion of speciation. The emphasis on natural and sexual selection thus makes the Darwinian view compatible with the modern genic concept of evolution. Genetic and molecular analyses of speciation in the last decade have yielded surprisingly strong support for the neo-Darwinian view of extensive genetic differentiation and epistasis during speciation. However, the extent falls short of what BSC requires in order to achieve whole-genome `cohesiveness'. Empirical observations suggest that the gene is the unit of species differentiation. Signi®cantly, the genetic architec- ture underlying RI, the patterns of species hybridization and the molecular signature of speciation genes all appear to support the view that RI is one of the manifestations of differential adaptation, as Darwin (1859, Chap. 8) suggested. The nature of this adaptation may be as much the result of sexual selection as natural selection. In the light of studies since its early days, BSC may now need a major revision by shifting the emphasis from isolation at the level of whole genome to differential adaptation at the genic level. With this revision, BSC would
    in fact be close to Darwin's original concept of speciation.

  • Identifiant unique
    10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00335.x
  • Accéder à la référence
  • Apparait dans la controverse
    La notion d' "espèce biologique" peut-elle s'appliquer à tout le vivant des vertébrés jusqu'aux unicellulaires et procaryotes ?
  • Comment les contributeurs jugent la qualité scientifique de cette référence :

    0
    0
    0
    1
    0